Temporary urban solutions help us deal with crisis 鈥� and can lead to radical shifts in city space
The coronavirus pandemic has resulted in new thinking about how cities are best organised to meet our needs. Part of this has involved short-term changes in the use of urban space.
In England, some have been relaxed to allow buildings to be repurposed in response to the crisis. In Italy, there are proposals to to intensive care units.
Our research into the shows the ways in which short-term development is deployed during times of crisis. Temporary uses also offer the opportunity for more fundamental in the longer term.
Rapid response
Responding to COVID-19, temporary spaces are providing a way of quickly bolstering intensive care bed spaces as demand spirals. London’s Nightingale hospital, in the , is one of a number of international examples of .
Temporary use may also help facilitate . have been used to deter car use and increase space for pedestrians.
There are also more imaginative examples. In Bristol, residents have created an informal to ensure safe passage between pedestrians and joggers in accordance with UK social distancing rules.
In Bogotá, curbs on car use have liberated space for the temporary expansion of the city’s network of cycle paths, helping, in turn, to reduce overcrowding on public transport. Likewise, Germany has introduced .
These measures are practical responses, reflecting changed priorities regarding urban infrastructure. But the history of in response to crises shows that short-term repurposing can address other needs.
After the 2011 earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand, a number of examples of of urban space emerged. Some – from an urban living room featuring a book exchange inside a to dance spaces on disused land with music from a – were about maintaining community spirit in the face of adversity.
Other temporary uses have responded to economic crises. In western cities after the global financial crisis, temporary re-use reflected landowners’ desire to maintain income and the wish of political leaders to protect local economies. This logic informed the establishment of temporary businesses known as or the re-use of shipping containers for everything from urban agriculture to shopping malls.
These examples show temporary use of land and buildings can play in keeping cities functioning in the face of adversity.
In the current health crisis, there is scope for temporary solutions again to prove vital. Equally, these short-term expedient measures could have longer-term benefits, extending beyond the current crisis.
The reduction of traffic, and installation of temporary cycle ways promotes new opportunities for play, health and sustainable mobility. As an example, could radically alter for the better.
More immediately, these measures would provide an alternative lifeline for communities if parks and green spaces were to eventually close.
Learning from the past
Lessons from the 2007/08 financial crisis suggest that allowing innovative adaptations to continue when something approaching normality resumes will be a challenge.
In the aftermath of the global financial crisis, the number of innovative temporary uses doubled in major English cities. But when the wider economy recovered, many innovative temporary uses – including urban farms, beach bars and pop-up cinemas – in favour of business-as-usual development. Those that remained were sometimes , often diluting their radical purpose.
Rather than encouraging new innovative or progressive uses of space, the deployment of mobile temporary use frequently served as a means to by encouraging speculative private investment in previously unattractive locations.
With COVID-19, temporary uses might prove to be more lasting. This is partly because the scale of the health crisis requires adaptation beyond a few landmark developments. It may also require at least some element of social distancing to be maintained for a protracted period. may require temporary design solutions to become more permanent, or to be deployed again if this or a similar health crisis resurfaces.
In the longer term, the shape of urban living after coronavirus, and the extent to which it is different, . But previous crises suggest that at least some of the temporary uses currently emerging may well endure into the future.
, Assistant Professor in Urban Design, ; , Senior Lecturer in Urban & Regional Policy and Planning, , and , Reader in Urban Studies and Planning, . This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .
糖心Vlog官方 has a growing list of scientists and academics who are either working on aspects of the COVID-19 outbreak or can make a valuable contribution to the national discourse. Please checkout our p.
Our people are also and with partners from across society to understand coronavirus (COVID-19) and its wide-ranging impacts on our lives. to support the University’s response to coronavirus or visit the University’s to lend a helping hand.